15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense

The linked article by John Rennie in Scientific American was originally published in 2002 but it hasn’t lost any of its actuality nor has it been refuted by creationists. Creationist arguments also haven’t changed significantly since then, demonstrating how they are simply unable to formulate an opposing theory to evolution.  I’ve also written some answers to creationists nonsense earlier on this blog and have also explored if creationism is plausible.

Opponents of evolution want to make a place for creationism by tearing down real science, but their arguments don’t hold up

Source: 15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense

1 1 vote
Rate this article

If you liked this article, you might enjoy these too:


Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

5 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
5
0
What do you think? Let me know!x
()
x